<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Detecting and Resolving LAMP Stack Problems &#8211; Scheduled Downtime</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.karlkatzke.com/detecting-and-resolving-lamp-stack-problems-scheduled-downtime/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.karlkatzke.com/detecting-and-resolving-lamp-stack-problems-scheduled-downtime/</link>
	<description>PHP, Puppies, and other Geekery</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 20:00:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tim Fountain</title>
		<link>http://www.karlkatzke.com/detecting-and-resolving-lamp-stack-problems-scheduled-downtime/comment-page-1/#comment-1691</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Fountain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 15:01:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.karlkatzke.com/?p=536#comment-1691</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m curious about your reasons for switching to InnoDB. Isn&#039;t MyISAM faster unless the application is write-heavy? Or are there some things that Drupal is doing that makes InnoDB more suitable?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m curious about your reasons for switching to InnoDB. Isn&#8217;t MyISAM faster unless the application is write-heavy? Or are there some things that Drupal is doing that makes InnoDB more suitable?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
