<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: HTMLPurifier just saved me countless hours</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.karlkatzke.com/htmlpurifier-just-saved-me-countless-hours/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.karlkatzke.com/htmlpurifier-just-saved-me-countless-hours/</link>
	<description>Geek of the Week</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2011 13:39:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Stackhouse</title>
		<link>http://www.karlkatzke.com/htmlpurifier-just-saved-me-countless-hours/comment-page-1/#comment-1243</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Stackhouse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 13:46:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.karlkatzke.com/?p=292#comment-1243</guid>
		<description>Karl, couldn&#039;t agree with you more.  Re-inventing the wheel for anything other than purely educational purposes is pretty dumb (from the stand-point of developer tools).  However, many people choose to try to offer a more usable or better looking or faster performing version of this or that commercial product.  That is competition, and , at least in theory, keeps us from having nothing but mountains of crappy software.

It has been my experience that developers re-invent the wheel most often because they don&#039;t know the wheel has been invented.  There are probably a great many well written tools that are just poorly publicized.  Another big reason for re-inventing tools is that they aren&#039;t cross platform or can&#039;t easily be invoked in anything but the language they were written in.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Karl, couldn&#8217;t agree with you more.  Re-inventing the wheel for anything other than purely educational purposes is pretty dumb (from the stand-point of developer tools).  However, many people choose to try to offer a more usable or better looking or faster performing version of this or that commercial product.  That is competition, and , at least in theory, keeps us from having nothing but mountains of crappy software.</p>
<p>It has been my experience that developers re-invent the wheel most often because they don&#8217;t know the wheel has been invented.  There are probably a great many well written tools that are just poorly publicized.  Another big reason for re-inventing tools is that they aren&#8217;t cross platform or can&#8217;t easily be invoked in anything but the language they were written in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Colnector</title>
		<link>http://www.karlkatzke.com/htmlpurifier-just-saved-me-countless-hours/comment-page-1/#comment-1240</link>
		<dc:creator>Colnector</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 09:06:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.karlkatzke.com/?p=292#comment-1240</guid>
		<description>Code reusability makes the web go round :)
Many times a true developer&#039;s work is not to reinvent the pieces but to connect them into the application.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Code reusability makes the web go round <img src='http://www.karlkatzke.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
Many times a true developer&#8217;s work is not to reinvent the pieces but to connect them into the application.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

