<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: MySQL Fulltext Index Stopwords</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.karlkatzke.com/mysql-fulltext-index-stopwords/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.karlkatzke.com/mysql-fulltext-index-stopwords/</link>
	<description>Geek of the Week</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2011 13:39:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hans</title>
		<link>http://www.karlkatzke.com/mysql-fulltext-index-stopwords/comment-page-1/#comment-1257</link>
		<dc:creator>Hans</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 21:04:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.karlkatzke.com/?p=299#comment-1257</guid>
		<description>I would heavily dissuade you from letting MySQL do full-text searching. It is currently very slow and you will take a big hit in system resources. Instead, I would suggest you consider some other alternatives, like Sphinx or Lucene. I can&#039;t say much for Lucene, as I haven&#039;t used it personally, but we used Sphinx originally for full-text searching, which it can do within a fraction of a second for even complex searches. However, since the most recent version, it also supports adding filters on other fields, which means that you can with a bit of effort effectively discard sending complex queries to MySQL on large datasets, instead letting Sphinx do the heavy work and passing the id&#039;s to MySQL to get the resulting records... and all very very very fast.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would heavily dissuade you from letting MySQL do full-text searching. It is currently very slow and you will take a big hit in system resources. Instead, I would suggest you consider some other alternatives, like Sphinx or Lucene. I can&#8217;t say much for Lucene, as I haven&#8217;t used it personally, but we used Sphinx originally for full-text searching, which it can do within a fraction of a second for even complex searches. However, since the most recent version, it also supports adding filters on other fields, which means that you can with a bit of effort effectively discard sending complex queries to MySQL on large datasets, instead letting Sphinx do the heavy work and passing the id&#8217;s to MySQL to get the resulting records&#8230; and all very very very fast.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

